HOFFMAN v. CONNALL

No. 6999-1-III.

43 Wn. App. 532 (1986)

718 P.2d 814

JAMES HOFFMAN, ET AL, Appellants, v. BRYAN G. CONNALL, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

April 29, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Agman, for appellants.

Carl Diana, for respondents Connall.

Terence R. Whitten, Erika Balazs, and Lukins & Annis, for respondents Cardinal Realty, et al.


MUNSON, J.

James and Verna Hoffman, husband and wife, appeal the dismissal of their claims against Bryan G. and Connie J. Connall, their real estate broker, Charles Huggins, and Cardinal Realty, Inc., for their alleged innocent misrepresentation of the boundaries of rural property they purchased from the Connalls. They argue: (1) the evidence is undisputed as to the misrepresentation; (2) the realtor breached his duty to take reasonable steps to avoid disseminating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases