EISENSTEIN v. GILL


125 A.D.2d 441 (1986)

Louis Eisenstein et al., Respondents, v. Wayne B. Gill, Individually and Doing Business as Jet Automatic Transmissions, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Chrysler Motor Corporation, Appellant. (And Five Third-Party Actions.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 15, 1986


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion in denying that branch of Chrysler's cross motion which was to direct the plaintiffs to serve a further bill of particulars. Our review of the record discloses that the plaintiffs' second supplemental bill of particulars is sufficiently responsive so as to serve the objectives of amplifying the pleadings, limiting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases