1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 513 A.2d
  5. 513 A.2d 42 (1986)
 

REED v. BOUCHARD

No. 84-308.

513 A.2d 42 (1986)

Janet M. REED v. Norman BOUCHARD d/b/a Bouchard's Excavating.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

June 20, 1986.

The testimony of plaintiff, objected to as a matter for an expert, was rationally based upon her perceptions, V.R.E. 701, and fell within the scope of common experience, see South Burlington School District v. Calcagni-Frazier-Zajchowski Architects, Inc., 138 Vt. 33, 46, 410 A.2d 1359, 1365 (1980). Therefore, it was properly admissible.

We find no error in the court's ruling as to the contract formed or the damages awarded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases