STATE v. PARDO

(12515)

199 Conn. 354 (1986)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. GUILLERMO PARDO

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 15, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Daniel Friedland, for the appellant (defendant).

James G. Clark, deputy assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were John M. Bailey, state's attorney, and Mark W. Brodsky, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

PETERS, C. J., DANNEHY, SANTANIELLO, CALLAHAN and MENT, JS.


PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Guillermo Pardo, was convicted by a jury of possession of narcotics with intent to sell, in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1983) § 21a-277 (a),1 and of possession of narcotics, in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).2 The defendant has raised three claims of error, none of which warrants extended discussion.

The jury could reasonably have found the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases