PER CURIAM.
We affirm the conviction for grand theft as appellant has failed to show reversible error. The circumstantial evidence pointed to appellant as the perpetrator of the offense to the reasonable exclusion of any other person. See Love v. State,
We vacate the sentencing part of the judgment with instructions to the trial court to impose a sentence within the guideline range...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.