1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 102 N.J.
  5. 102 N.J. 440 (1986)
 

MATTER OF FLEISCHER

102 N.J. 440 (1986)

508 A.2d 1115

IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD L. FLEISCHER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW. IN THE MATTER OF H. BARRY SHULTZ, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW. IN THE MATTER OF JAY L. SCHWIMER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Johnson, Jr., Director, argued the cause for the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Justin P. Walder argued the cause for respondents (Walder, Sondak, Berkeley & Brogan, attorneys; Justin P. Walder and Dominic J. Aprile on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

These disciplinary proceedings involve three respondents, who constitute all the members of their former law firm. They are charged with various ethical infractions, most notably the misappropriation of clients' funds. Although one member of the firm, respondent Fleischer, was primarily responsible for the firm's disbursements, all three respondents knew of and participated in the misappropriation.

After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases