PEOPLE v. KRISSICK


125 A.D.2d 415 (1986)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David J. Krissick, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 8, 1986


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the photographic array viewed by the witness was unduly suggestive is without merit. It is well settled that "great weight must be accorded the determination of the hearing court with its particular advantages of having seen and heard the witnesses (People v Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761), and that determination that the identification should not be disturbed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases