DAUPHIN v. SMITH

No. 6870-2-II.

42 Wn. App. 491 (1986)

713 P.2d 116

GILBERT O. DAUPHIN, Respondent, v. MARK FREDERICK SMITH, ET AL, Defendants, JOSEPH DEPIETRO, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

January 2, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian T. Comfort and Billett, Comfort & Rosenow, for appellants.

Kathleen B. Ebert and Bonneville, Viert, Morton & McGoldrick, for respondent.


REED, A.C.J.

DPPMB Associates appeals an award of attorney's fees levied against it in favor of the plaintiff, Gilbert Dauphin, on a theory of equitable indemnity. The trial court was persuaded that DPPMB had acted wrongfully in refusing Dauphin's demands and had thereby forced him to initiate his suit. We conclude that DPPMB did not act wrongfully and was acting reasonably to protect its interests. We therefore reverse the award of attorney's fees to Dauphin.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases