1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 106 Wn.2d
  5. 106 Wn.2d 425 (1986)
 

METROPOLITAN PARK DIST. OF TACOMA v. GRIFFITH

No. 52083-6.

106 Wn.2d 425 (1986)

723 P.2d 1093

METROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT OF TACOMA, Respondent, v. HAL E. GRIFFITH, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danielson, Harrigan, Smith & Tollefson, by Arthur W. Harrigan, Jr., for appellants.

Davies Pearson, P.C., by John C. Kouklis and Art Wang, for respondent.

DURHAM, J.

This case involves two consolidated appeals. Hal E. Griffith appeals from a declaratory judgment determining the parties' rights under a concession agreement. He contends the trial court erred in deciding that two 10-year options to renew a concession agreement were unenforceable, and in concluding that the Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma did not breach the agreement by denying his requests to serve liquor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases