GLIDDEN COATINGS & RESINS v. SUITT CONST. CO., INC.

0799

290 S.C. 240 (1986)

349 S.E.2d 89

GLIDDEN COATINGS & RESINS, a DIVISION OF SCM CORP., Appellant v. SUITT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and Earl Cummins d/b/a Arrow Painting and Sandblasting, of whom Suitt Construction Co., Inc., is Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided September 22, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander S. Macaulay, of Miley & Macaulay, Walhalla, for appellant.

Robert A. deHoll and James H. Watson, of Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, Greenville, for respondent.


Heard June 17, 1986.

Decided Sept. 22, 1986.

BELL, Judge:

Glidden Coatings & Resins commenced an action to foreclose a materialman's lien on a construction project, known as the Fairfield project, for which it has supplied paints and materials. Suitt Construction Co., Inc. was the general contractor on the project and Arrow Painting and Sandblasting was the painting subcontractor. After Glidden filed its notice and certificate of mechanic's lien...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases