1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 182 Cal.App.3d
  5. 182 Cal.App.3d 342 (1986)
 

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. BLOODGOOD

Docket No. B013145.

182 Cal.App.3d 342 (1986)

226 Cal. Rptr. 924

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARK H. BLOODGOOD, as Auditor-Controller, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

June 13, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and Lawrence B. Launer, Assistant County Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants.

Weiser, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, R. Bruce Tepper, Jr., and Kathryn Reimann for Petitioner and Respondent.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

The issue in this case is whether a community redevelopment agency is entitled to a share of the delinquency penalties, interest and redemption penalties arising from unpaid property taxes within its jurisdiction. We find the agency is entitled to share in this revenue when property sold for unpaid taxes is redeemed. Therefore, we affirm the judgment below.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases