ROE v. BONURA


132 Misc.2d 390 (1986)

Janice M. Roe, Plaintiff, v. Frank Bonura, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Suffolk County.

June 19, 1986


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Furey & Furey for defendant. Shapiro & Wolinsky for plaintiff.


DANIEL F. LUCIANO, J.

This motion by the defendant, Frank Bonura, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the action was not commenced within the applicable Statute of Limitations is denied.

In this action arising as a consequence of the alleged wrongdoing of the defendant, Frank Bonura, a physician, in rendering care and treatment to the plaintiff, Janice M. Roe, the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases