1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 346 S.E.2d
  5. 346 S.E.2d 173 (1986)
 

WOODRUFF v. SHUFORD

No. 8625SC159.

346 S.E.2d 173 (1986)

Howard WOODRUFF v. Robert L. SHUFORD, III.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 5, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilson and Palmer, P.A. by William C. Palmer, for plaintiff-appellee.

Rudisill & Brackett, P.A. by J. Steven Brackett, for defendant-appellant.

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in failing to grant his motion for a directed verdict. We disagree.

In general,

[i]n considering any motion for directed verdict [under N.C.Gen.Stat. 1A-1, Rule 50], the trial court must view all the evidence that supports the non-movant's claim as being true and that evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the non-movant, giving to the non-movant the benefit of every reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases