1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 152 Ariz.
  5. 152 Ariz. 367 (1986)
 

MOLEVER v. ROUSH

No. 1 CA-CIV 8045.

152 Ariz. 367 (1986)

732 P.2d 1105

I.M. MOLEVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross Appellee, v. Charles D. ROUSH, an individual, and Treon, Warnicke, Dann & Roush, P.A., Defendants-Appellees, Cross Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

Reconsideration Denied January 21, 1987.

Review Denied February 11, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beus, Gilbert, Wake & Morrill by Neil Vincent Wake, C. Steven McMurry, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellant, cross appellee.

Monbleau, Vermeire & Turley, P.C. by Kent E. Turley, Albert R. Vermeire, Phoenix, for defendants-appellees, cross appellants.

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

This case incorporates two appeals in one, a direct appeal and a cross-appeal. The case began as a legal malpractice action brought by I.M. Molever (Molever) against attorney, Charles D. Roush and Roush's law firm, Treon, Warnicke, Dann & Roush, P.A. (Roush). The complaint in malpractice had two counts. Count I alleged negligence and breach of contract by Roush in an action against attorneys Stanley E. Preiser and John F. Brown, Jr...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases