CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. BRADDOCK

D.D. No. 85-37.

21 Ohio St. 3d 30 (1986)

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. BRADDOCK.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 2, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest A. Eyon II, Edwin W. Patterson III and Charles E. Mitchell, for relator.


Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact and conclusions of fact of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board's findings that Robert L. Braddock did in fact violate DR 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(4), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), 7-101(A)(3), 7-102(A)(3), and Gov. Bar R. V(4).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law and that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases