1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 395 N.W.2d
  5. 395 N.W.2d 115 (1986)
 

AMOCO OIL CO. v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

No. C3-86-992.

395 N.W.2d 115 (1986)

AMOCO OIL COMPANY, Appellant, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip W. Getts, Pepin, Dayton, Herman, Graham & Getts, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert J. Alfton, City Atty., William C. Dunning, Asst. City Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and FORSBERG and LESLIE, JJ.

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

The City of Minneapolis denied Amoco Oil Company's application for a conditional use permit to operate a twenty-four-hour combination gas station and grocery store because the store conflicted with the city's comprehensive zoning plan and because it would detrimentally impact upon neighboring residents. Amoco brought an action against the city for declaratory and injunctive relief. Both parties moved for summary judgment and the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases