1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 67 N.Y.2d
  5. 67 N.Y.2d 434 (1986)
 

URBAN RENEWAL v. MANCULICH

67 N.Y.2d 434 (1986)

In the Matter of Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent, v. John Manculich et al., Appellants. (And Two Other Proceedings.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald R. Benjamin for appellants.

Kenneth Auerbach, Corporation Counsel (David M. Dutko of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur in Per Curiam opinion.

Per Curiam.

Respondent, the Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency (BURA), is a municipal urban renewal agency established by the Legislature (General Municipal Law § 572). After studies indicating blight and a threat to public health, safety and welfare in what became the project area, in March 1980 BURA by resolution adopted the Clinton Street Redevelopment Project, a $3.4 million urban renewal project dedicated principally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases