BRINK v. BRINK

No. C7-86-820.

396 N.W.2d 95 (1986)

In re the Marriage of Carol G. BRINK, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Robert G. BRINK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 18, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Janson, Schmitt, Johnson, Marso & Janson, St. Cloud, for appellant.

James G. Metcalf, Metcalf & Larson, Monticello, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and HUSPENI, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, Carol Brink, and respondent, Robert Brink, both petitioned the trial court to have their dissolution judgment amended to include omitted property. The trial court found that respondent was entitled to all the proceeds from a contract for deed on property appellant and respondent owned as joint tenants. Appellant argues that she is entitled to one-half of the proceeds from the contract for deed and that the trial court abused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases