1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 11 Kan.
  5. 11 Kan. App. 2d 38 (1986)
 

DaMAC DRILLING, INC. v. SHOEMAKE

No. 57,217

11 Kan. App. 2d 38 (1986)

713 P.2d 480

DaMAC DRILLING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID SHOEMAKE, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and THE BUIE CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID SHOEMAKE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Opinion filed January 16, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Pike, of McPherson, Bauer, Pike & Pike, Chartered, of Great Bend, for appellant DaMac Drilling, Inc.

John L. Kratzer, Jr., of Timmerman & Kratzer, of Wichita, for appellees Geological Services, Inc., C. Edward Wray and Toby Elster.

David D. Gaumer of Law Office of David D. Gaumer, P.A., of Kingman, for appellee Rex Hawkins, d/b/a Hawkins Oil Field Supply.

Before PARKS, P.J., MEYER, J., and DONALD L. ALLEGRUCCI, District Judge, assigned.

PARKS, J.:

This case arises out of the foreclosure of a number of lien claims against an oil and gas lease. The owner of the leasehold, DaMac Drilling, Inc., (DaMac) appeals from the rulings of the trial court upholding the validity of lien claims filed by Rex Hawkins, d/b/a Hawkins Oil Field Supply (Hawkins) and Geological Services, Inc., (Geological Services) and excluding the overriding royalty interest from foreclosure.

DaMac obtained its interest in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases