SNYDER v. MUNRO

No. 52715-6.

106 Wn.2d 380 (1986)

721 P.2d 962

SID SNYDER, ET AL, Petitioners, v. RALPH MUNRO, as Secretary of State, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 10, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeff Campiche and Sherrie Bennett Campiche, for petitioners.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, James M. Johnson, Senior Assistant, and Shirley W. Battan, Assistant, for respondents.


DOLLIVER, C.J.

Plaintiffs petition this court for an alternative writ of mandamus and prohibition and submit a complaint for a declaratory judgment that the portion of RCW 44.07B, which establishes the boundaries in state legislative (representative) districts (19-A, 19-B, 39-A, 39-B (RCW 44.07B.190, .195, .390 and .395)), be found defective under the federal and state constitutions. We find RCW 44.07B constitutional and, therefore, deny plaintiffs' petition.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases