1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 28 Ohio
  5. 28 Ohio St. 3d 20 (1986)
 

HAL ARTZ LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC. v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. 86-120.

28 Ohio St. 3d 20 (1986)

HAL ARTZ LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, LINCOLN-MERCURY DIVISION, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 19, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baker & Hostetler, George W. Hairston, Richard W. Siehl and Daniel T. Kobil, for appellees Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Frank Nero Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., and Cross Roads Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

Friedman & Chenette; Jeffrey H. Friedman and Frank A. Chenette; and Perry R. Silverman, for appellee Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, LeQuita C. Hopgood and Simon B. Karas, for appellee Motor Vehicle Dealers Board.

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Earl F. Morris, Joseph W. Ryan, Jr. and David R. Larrouy, for appellant.

CELEBREZZE, C.J.

The question presented in this appeal centers on whether the Motor Vehicle Dealers Board, by granting a motion for rehearing and reconsideration of an earlier order before a court appeal is filed and prior to expiration of the statutory fifteen-day appeal period, retains jurisdiction to rehear the cause and thereafter issue a reconsidered decision after the appeal period has expired.8

Ford argues that the board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases