HUDSON v. LEOPOLD

22485

288 S.C. 194 (1986)

341 S.E.2d 137

Jean Hart HUDSON, Respondent v. Catherine Goss LEOPOLD, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided February 27, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ivan M. Nossokoff, and Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., of Igleheart & Wendt, Charleston, for respondent.

Richard C. Bell and Diane M. LeHoullier, both of Bell & McNeill, Mt. Pleasant, for appellant.


Heard Jan. 20, 1986.

Decided Feb. 27, 1986.

GREGORY, Justice:

This is an action to rescind a deed. Respondent's complaint alleged undue influence and incapacity. The trial judge, without reference, found the deed to be the product of undue influence. This appeal followed. We reverse.

First, appellant argues the trial judge erred in placing with her the burden to disprove the allegation of undue influence. The lower court reasoned the confidential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases