Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The credible evidence adduced at the traverse hearing established that the "nailing" of process was to the front door of a house in which the respondent had a separate, distinct and clearly marked office entrance at the side of the building. Such did not, therefore, comply with CPLR 308 (4) which requires affixation to the door of the "actual place of business". Further, the respondent's testimony established...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
