1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 395 N.W.2d
  5. 395 N.W.2d 83 (1986)
 

STATE v. ANDERSON

No. C1-85-2276.

395 N.W.2d 83 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. David Charles ANDERSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, State Atty. Gen., Alfred P. Zdrazil, City Atty., Bemidji, for respondent.

Mark L. Rodgers, Kief, Fuller, Baer, Wallner & Rodgers, Ltd., Bemidji, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and FOLEY and LANSING, JJ.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

David Charles Anderson appeals from a December 9, 1985 judgment of conviction for being in physical control of a motor vehicle with an alcohol concentration over .10 in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(d) (1984). Anderson contends that the trial court committed reversible error by excluding a videotape of him made shortly after his arrest that was relevant to his physical condition and by admitting a urine test analysis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases