THE DREIER COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITRONIX CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND ANDREW YASENCHAK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 10, 1986.
Decided November 10, 1986.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lawrence B. Sachs, argued the cause for appellant (Sapiro and Gottlieb, attorneys, Lawrence Sachs on the brief).
Vincent J. Dotoli, Esquire, argued the cause for respondent Yasenchak (Vincent Dotoli on the brief).
David R. Strickler argued the cause for respondent Unitronix Corporation (Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, attorneys; David Strickler on the brief).
Before Judges KING, HAVEY and MUIR.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.
The primary issue raised by this appeal is when does a cause of action for breach of warranty in the sale of a computer system accrue for purposes of triggering the running of a one-year time-bar contained in the sales agreement. The Law Division judge determined that the cause of action accrued upon latest delivery of the computer hardware components. We hold...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
