1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 6 Conn.
  5. 6 Conn. App. 471 (1986)
 

HEISKELL v. HEISKELL

(3719)

6 Conn. App. 471 (1986)

ANDREW HEISKELL v. PATRICIA HEISKELL

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released March 18, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Rubenstein, with whom, on the brief, was Harold Brienes, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Warren P. Joblin, for the appellee (defendant).

DUPONT, C. J., BORDEN and BIELUCH, JS.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties, the plaintiff husband primarily claims that General Statutes § 46b-81 is unconstitutional because it violates the fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution and article first, §§ 8 and 10 of the state constitution. He also claims that the state trial referee, acting as the trial court, awarded alimony without considering all of the relevant criteria of General Statutes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases