1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 119 A.D.2d
  5. 119 A.D.2d 358 (1986)
 

COUNTY OF BROOME v. STATE

119 A.D.2d 358 (1986)

County of Broome et al., Respondents, and County of Madison et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

October 23, 1986

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hancock & Estabrook (David E. Peebles and Elletta Sangrey Callahan of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Lew A. Millenbach and Peter J. Dooley of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

WEISS, MIKOLL, YESAWICH, JR., and HARVEY, JJ., concur.

MAHONEY, P. J.

Claimants are 12 New York counties who were named in at least one of three Federal court actions instituted by various Oneida Indian tribes or Nations based on allegations that certain lands were unlawfully taken from their ancestors by the State, the predecessor in title to the counties. Two of those actions sought return of the land; the other sought money damages. The counties made a written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases