1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 131 Wis.2d
  5. 131 Wis.2d 332 (1986)
 

SCHUMACHER v. SCHUMACHER

No. 84-2170.

131 Wis.2d 332 (1986)

388 N.W.2d 912

Marlene SCHUMACHER, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Vernon A. SCHUMACHER, Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 20, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Richard L. Everson, Milwaukee, and John M Baker, of counsel, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Everson and Mr. Baker.

For the petitioner-respondent there was a brief by Robert L.Jackson, Jr., Milwaukee, and Clare L. Fiorenza and Fiorenza & Hodan, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Clare L. Fiorenza.

BABLITCH, J. Vernon A.

Schumacher (Vernon) contends that the circuit court abused its discretion by setting aside an antenuptial agreement which he and Marlene C. Schumacher (Marlene) had executed, when the court divided the couple's property at divorce, pursuant to sec. 767.255, Stats. Because we conclude that the Schumbacher's agreement was inequitable inasmuch as the parties did not disclose their assets fairly and reasonably...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases