GTE SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Appellant
v.
The PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Telecommunications Systems, Inc., Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, AT&T Communications of the Southern States, Inc., United Telephone Company of the Carolinas, and the Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina, Respondents.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Heard December 17, 1985.
Decided February 25, 1986.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jay Bender, of Belser, Baker, Barwick, Ravenel, Toal & Bender, Columbia, and Phyllis A. Whitten, of GTE Sprint Communications Corp., Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Arthur G. Fusco and Sarena K. Dickerson, of the South Carolina Public Service Com'n, Columbia, for respondent The Public Service Com'n of South Carolina.
Mitchell M. Willoughby, of Willoughby & Scott, Columbia, for respondent Telecommunications Systems, Inc.
Fred A. Walters, of Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., and John D. Gregory, of Lewis, Babcock, Gregory & Pleicones, Columbia, for respondent Southern Bell Tel. and Tel. Co.
Francis P. Mood and Belton T. Zeigler, Boyd, Knowlton, Tate & Finlay, Columbia, for respondent AT&T Communications of the Southern States, Inc.
William F. Austin and Russell H. Putnam, Columbia, for respondent United Telephone Co. of the Carolinas.
Steven W. Hamm, Nancy J. Vaughn and Natalie J. Moore, all of the South Carolina Dept. of Consumer Affairs, Columbia, for respondent The Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard Dec. 17, 1985.
Decided Feb. 25, 1986.
CHANDLER, Justice:
GTE Sprint Communications Corporation (GTE) appeals a Circuit Court Order which affirmed a Public Service Commission (PSC) Order. PSC denied GTE a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide unlimited intercity telecommunications services in South Carolina. Specifically, GTE was granted a certificate to provide inter-LATA service...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
