1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 350 S.E.2d
  5. 350 S.E.2d 95 (1986)
 

CAROTHERS v. TI-CARO

No. 8610IC364.

350 S.E.2d 95 (1986)

83 N.C. App. 301

Ora E. CAROTHERS, Employee, Plaintiff; v. TI-CARO and/or Parkdale Mills, Employers, and Liberty Mutual and/or Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Carriers, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 18, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Hassell, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Mullen, Holland & Cooper, P.A. by H. Julian Philpott, Jr., Gastonia, for defendants-appellees.

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendants attempt at the outset to dispense with plaintiff's arguments by maintaining that plaintiff's appeal should be dismissed. Defendants may challenge the propriety of the judgment for the first time in their brief pursuant to the proviso under Rule 10(a), N.C.Rules App.P. Specifically, defendants contend that the appeal should be dismissed for the following reason: no timely appeal was taken by either...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases