STATE v. KLIMEK

No. C4-86-421.

398 N.W.2d 41 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Floyd Alexander KLIMEK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 23, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lance R. Heisler, Staples, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, B. Joseph Majors, II, Wadena Co. Atty., Wadena, for respondent.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and WOZNIAK and NIERENGARTEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The trial court found appellant, Floyd Klimek, guilty of disorderly conduct under Minn.Stat. § 609.72, subd. 1(3) (1984). On appeal, Klimek argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.

FACTS

This case involves a charge of disorderly conduct. In May 1985, Mrs. Klimek filed an order for protection against appellant, her former husband. The court granted Mrs. Klimek custody of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases