1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 385 N.W.2d
  5. 385 N.W.2d 47 (1986)
 

STRANGIS v. METROPOLITAN BANK

No. C1-85-2231.

385 N.W.2d 47 (1986)

Bruno G. STRANGIS, et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN BANK, f.k.a. Metropolitan State Bank, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott G. Harris, Frank R. Berman, P.C., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Gary D. Pihlstrom, Adams, Atkinson & Pihlstrom, Edina, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and FORSBERG and LESLIE, JJ.

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a trial court order granting respondents' motion for temporary injunction and a second order denying appellant's motion for increased bond. Appellant claims (1) temporary injunction was not appropriate because an adequate legal remedy exists, and (2) increased bond is necessary because appellant is under-collateralized. We affirm.

FACTS

On June 11, 1982, respondents Bruno and Juila Strangis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases