1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 105 Wn.2d
  5. 105 Wn.2d 327 (1986)
 

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

No. 51910-2.

105 Wn.2d 327 (1986)

715 P.2d 128

NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 6, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bogle & Gates, John T. Piper, D. Michael Young, Franklin G. Dinces, and James R. Johnston, for appellants.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and William B. Collins, Assistant, for respondent.

UTTER, J.

This is a direct appeal from the trial court where various commercial enterprises (Taxpayers) claimed Washington's multiple activities exemption to the business and occupation (B & O) tax, RCW 82.04.440, discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause, U.S. Const. art. 1, § 8. The trial court ruled there was no unlawful discrimination. We agree and hold for the respondent, Department of Revenue, that the challenged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases