1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 182 Cal.App.3d
  5. 182 Cal.App.3d 246 (1986)
 

FENDRICH v. VAN DE KAMP

Docket No. B007053.

182 Cal.App.3d 246 (1986)

227 Cal. Rptr. 262

ELIZABETH R. FENDRICH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP, as Attorney General, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

June 11, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Richard D. Dear and John H. Bauman for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, and Stephen S. Handin, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

FEINERMAN, P.J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate which challenged the constitutionality of certain regulations propounded by the Attorney General of California under The Gaming Registration Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 19800 et seq.). Appellants contend that the Attorney General's regulations deprive them of due process and equal protection, violate their fundamental right to privacy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases