1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 186 Cal.App.3d
  5. 186 Cal.App.3d 239 (1986)
 

SMITH v. ROYAL INS. CO.

Docket No. F005400.

186 Cal.App.3d 239 (1986)

230 Cal. Rptr. 495

LAURA SMITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

October 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Linneman, Burgess, Telles, Van Atta & Vierra and James E. Linneman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Parichan, Renberg, Crossman & Harvey, Charles L. Renberg and Randall M. Penner for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

FRANSON, Acting P.J. —

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant Laura Smith seeks to establish coverage under an uninsured motorist clause contained in an automobile bodily injury liability policy issued by respondent Royal Insurance Company of America. The case came to trial before the court on stipulated facts, the only question being one of law. The court entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases