1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 152 Ariz.
  5. 152 Ariz. 261 (1986)
 

NIECIKOWSKI v. DAVIS

No. 2 CA-CIV 5684.

152 Ariz. 261 (1986)

731 P.2d 626

Edward F. NIECIKOWSKI, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Charles Joseph DAVIS and Jane Doe Davis, husband and wife, and Tucson Sand & Soil, a domestic corporation, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Review Denied January 13, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dix, Rehling & Waterman by David M. Waterman and Elliot A. Glicksman, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

Kimble, Gothreau, Nelson & Cannon, P.C. by Gus Aragon, Jr., Tucson, for defendants/appellees.

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellant Edward Niecikowski appeals from the jury verdict in favor of appellees Charles Davis and Davis' employer, Tucson Sand and Soil, Inc. He contends that the trial judge improperly instructed the jury by reading several statutes which he argues were not supported by the evidence and that he failed to properly apply the rules of the road to the facts of the case. We find no error and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases