1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 188 Cal.App.3d
  5. 188 Cal.App.3d 224 (1986)
 

TANNEHILL v. FINCH

Docket No. G001995.

188 Cal.App.3d 224 (1986)

232 Cal. Rptr. 749

ELAINE TANNEHILL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SAM N. FINCH, SR., Defendant and Appellant. SAM N. FINCH, SR., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ELAINE TANNEHILL, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

December 22, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Marvin T. Sawyer for Defendant and Appellant and Plaintiff and Appellant.

Scott, Persinger, Muehl & Kebre and R.E. Scott for Plaintiff and Respondent and Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

WALLIN, J.

What is the appropriate burden of proof instruction in an action based on Marvin v. Marvin (1976) 18 Cal.3d 660 [134 Cal.Rptr. 815, 557 P.2d 106] in which plaintiff is seeking to establish a one-half interest in property held in the name of the defendant?

I

Elaine Tannehill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases