1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 28 Ohio
  5. 28 Ohio St. 3d 383 (1986)
 

STATE EX REL. CASE v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 86-667.

28 Ohio St. 3d 383 (1986)

THE STATE, EX REL. CASE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 26, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larrimer & Larrimer, Richard S. Hunter and Craig Aalyson, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Michael L. Squillace, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Our first query is whether the court of appeals erred in holding that laches bars appellant's action in mandamus. The doctrine of laches is based upon the maxim vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (the laws aid the vigilant, and not those who slumber on their rights). In our unanimous opinion in Connin v. Bailey (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 34, 35, we set forth the applicable law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases