KURTZ v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

No. 1038 C.D. 1985.

101 Pa.Commw. 299 (1986)

516 A.2d 410

Mary E. Kurtz, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

October 17, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Cowden, Handler, Gerber, Johnston, Strokoff & Cowden, for petitioner.

Samuel H. Lewis, Associate Counsel, with him, Paul E. Baker, Acting Deputy Chief Counsel, for respondent.

Submitted on briefs September 11, 1986, to Judges CRAIG, COLINS and PALLADINO, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE CRAIG, October 17, 1986:

Does a claimant remain eligible for unemployment compensation, on the basis that a job termination was for a necessitous and compelling cause, where the claimant has quit in order to marry and join a spouse employed in a distant location?

Claimant Mary E. Kurtz has appealed a denial of her unemployment compensation claim, issued by a referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review on the ground that her unemployment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases