1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 185 Cal.App.3d
  5. 185 Cal.App.3d 211 (1986)
 

SUMITOMO BANK v. TAURUS DEVELOPERS, INC.

Docket No. D003296.

185 Cal.App.3d 211 (1986)

229 Cal. Rptr. 719

SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TAURUS DEVELOPERS, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

September 5, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Flinn, Matzger & Melnick, Harvey L. Gould, Jeffrey H. Lowenthal and Steven B. Mains for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lillick, McHose & Charles and James D. Hoey III for Defendants and Respondents.

Hetland & Hansen, John R. Hetland and Charles A. Hansen as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

WORK, J.

The Sumitomo Bank of California (Bank or Sumitomo) appeals from a judgment of dismissal after demurrers were sustained without leave to amend on its causes of action against Taurus Developers, Inc. We affirm the portion of the judgment dismissing the causes of action for breach of contract, bad faith waste, fraud, and violations of the Business and Professions Code, since they are barred under the full credit bid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases