CURRY v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

No. 14 C.D. 1985.

94 Pa.Commw. 300 (1986)

Clarence Curry, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

January 23, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martha F. Lindner, Brady, Lindner & Cullen, for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Richard E. Geschke, Jr., with him, Karl A. Fritton, Sprecher, Felix, Visco, Hutchison & Young, for intervenor, Purex Corporation.

Argued December 9, 1985, before Judges ROGERS and PALLADINO, and Senior Judge BARBIERI, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE ROGERS, January 23, 1986:

Clarence Curry (claimant) appeals an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming a referee's denial of benefits. We affirm.

The claimant was employed by Purex Industries Inc. (Purex) as a liquid detergent case stacker from August 19, 1963 through September 30, 1984. He was laid off on August 7, 1984. In a letter dated August 10, 1984, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases