Per Curiam.
The basis of appellant's argument is that, while individual physicians and a psychologist made particular findings with respect to her lumbosacral strain and her accompanying depressive neurosis, none of the reports complied with recent holdings which follow State, ex rel. Anderson, v. Indus. Comm. (1980),
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.