Per Curiam.
The sole issue meriting discussion on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing defendant's request for a specific, cautionary charge to the jury on evaluating eyewitness identification testimony (see, 1 CJI [NY] 10.01, pp 583-589). The victim testified that on the evening of the robbery, he patronized various bars in the City of Binghamton while celebrating the advent of spring vacation at the local community college he was attending...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
