The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney by this court on June 21, 1939.
In this proceeding to discipline the respondent for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and the respondent cross-moves to disaffirm in part and confirm in part said report.
The Special Referee found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct as follows...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.