1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 182 Cal.App.3d
  5. 182 Cal.App.3d 196 (1986)
 

FORRAND v. FOODMAKER, INC.

Docket No. B006084.

182 Cal.App.3d 196 (1986)

227 Cal. Rptr. 74

KEITH WARD FORRAND, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FOODMAKER, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

June 10, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Morgan, Wenzel & McNicholas, Timothy B. Bradford, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland and Alan G. Martin for Defendant and Appellant.

Hurley, Grassini & Wrinkle, Lawrence Grassini and Roland Wrinkle for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

HASTINGS, J.

After a jury trial, the negligence of defendant/appellant Foodmaker, Inc., doing business as Jack-in-the-Box (appellant), was found to have been the sole cause of injuries sustained by plaintiff/respondent Keith W. Forrand (respondent). To have reached this verdict, the jury believed the following to be true:

On July 17, 1977, at approximately 6:50 a.m., Glenn Dore (Dore) a 15-year-old runaway, committed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases