1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 44 Wn.
  5. 44 Wn. App. 330 (1986)
 

LOCKWOOD v. A C & S, INC.

Nos. 14422-7-I; 14444-8-I; 14475-8-I; 14478-2-I; 14504-5-I; 14573-8-I.

44 Wn. App. 330 (1986)

722 P.2d 826

ALBERT LOCKWOOD, ET AL, Respondents, v. A C & S, INC., ET AL, Defendants, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Respondent, RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

July 14, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip A. Talmadge, Allen R. Sakai, John J. Soltys, and Karr, Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer, Morrow & Sax, P.S., for appellant.

William S. Bailey and Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, for respondents Lockwood.

Bruce Erickson and Garvey, Schubert, Adams & Barer, for respondent Pittsburgh Corning Corporation.

GROSSE, J.

This is an appeal by Raymark Industries, Inc., from a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs Albert and Dorothy Lockwood (hereinafter Lockwood) for injuries resulting from Albert Lockwood's prolonged exposure during the course of his employment to asbestos products of which Raymark was a principal manufacturer. On appeal, Raymark's primary assignments of error are directed to the admission or sufficiency of evidence but, nevertheless, raise difficult and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases