1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 8 Conn.
  5. 8 Conn. App. 364 (1986)
 

PRESNICK v. ESPOSITO

(4221), (4399)

8 Conn. App. 364 (1986)

DANIEL V. PRESNICK v. RALPH ESPOSITO ET AL. RALPH ESPOSITO ET AL. v. DANIEL V. PRESNICK

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released August 5, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel V. Presnick, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff in the first case, defendant in the second case).

James R. Smith, for the appellees (defendants in the first case, plaintiffs in the second case).

BORDEN, DALY and BIELUCH, JS.

BORDEN, J.

These two appeals present the common issue of whether the trial court may preclude an attorney from representing only himself in litigation before the court. In each case, the court entered an order effectively barring the attorney from doing so. We find error in each appeal.

In the first case, Daniel V. Presnick, who is an attorney, sued Ralph and Rita Esposito for legal fees for services which he rendered to them in another case. Presnick did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases