VALLILLO v. MUSKIN CORP.


212 N.J. Super. 155 (1986)

514 A.2d 528

STEPHEN VALLILLO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MUSKIN CORPORATION, S.K. PLASTICS CORP., DAVIS SWIM POOL CENTER AND EDWARD VALLILLO AND DONNA VALLILLO, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William T. Connell argued the cause for appellant Muskin Corporation (Dwyer, Connell & Lisbona, attorneys, William T. Connell, on the brief).

John S. Fetten argued the cause for appellant S.K. Plastics, Inc. (Robert C. Pollock, Jr., attorney, Glenn A. Montgomery, on the brief).

Donald S. Goldman argued the cause for appellant Davis Swim Pool Center (Harkavy, Goldman, Goldman & Caprio, attorneys, Martin S. Goldman, on the brief).

George J. Duffy argued the cause for respondent (Baker, Garber, Duffy & Baker, attorneys, George J. Duffy, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, BILDER and GRUCCIO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Defendants Muskin Corporation (Muskin), S.K. Plastic, Inc. (S.K.), and Davis Swim Pool Center (Davis) have appealed, by leave granted, from the denial of their summary judgment motions in the Law Division.

Muskin was the manufacturer of an above-the-ground pool frame originally purchased through Davis1. Codefendants Edward...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases