DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RUSSO

D.D. No. 85-24.

21 Ohio St. 3d 15 (1986)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RUSSO.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 2, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.

Paul H. Hentemann and Donald J. Huffman, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board's findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A) (3); 7-101(A)(1), (2) and (3); 7-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 9-102(A) and (B); and 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that Russo be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases