CINCINNATI RIVERFRONT COLISEUM, INC. v. McNULTY CO.

No. 85-2006.

28 Ohio St. 3d 333 (1986)

CINCINNATI RIVERFRONT COLISEUM, INC., APPELLEE, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. McNULTY CO. ET AL.; CLARK ENGINEERING CO., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT; CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 26, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frost & Jacobs, Gary L. Herfel and Mark H. Klusmeier, for appellee, appellant and cross-appellee, Cincinnati Riverfront Coliseum, Inc.

Strauss & Troy and Ernest A. Eynon II, for appellee and cross-appellant, Clark Engineering Company.

Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, Jerry F. Luttenegger and Daniel J. Schlueter, for appellant and cross-appellee, city of Cincinnati.


LOCHER, J.

The general issues presented in the instant action are (1) whether a new trial was properly granted to Clark and (2) whether the city's motions for a directed verdict were properly denied. For the reasons that follow, we answer in the affirmative on both issues and uphold the decision of the court of appeals.

I

The Riverfront Appeal

Riverfront contends that the court of appeals erred when it reversed the decision of the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases